You Are Here:

Community: Developer Discussion Boards

#1 Old signing - 2007-06-21, 17:18

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
felixksp
Offline
Regular Contributor
Hi all,

I am working on testing my application to be signed by JavaVerified. My doubt is that my application once will be signed, will be able to be installed on any device or group of devices, or won't.

I don't know if I have to sign that once by type of device (brand and model), once by brand, only once...

Please any help.
Reply With Quote

#2 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-22, 02:11

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,408
Location: USA, CA
hartti's Avatar
hartti
Offline
Nokia Expert
The Java Verified testing is done for one device group at one time. So if you will be selling your application for a number of devices you should test it against all target devices (or all the device groups containing the target devices).
The Java Verified certificate is same on all of the phones though. So once it gets signed with this UTI root, it can be installed on all phones containing the certificate.

Hartti
Reply With Quote

#3 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-22, 10:08

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
felixksp
Offline
Regular Contributor
I have understood that we have to send different jar files for every type of devices, no? So isn't possible to send the same jar file for two types of devices?

We are testing the application in Nokia N91, N80, E61 and N95, so we should to send four times different jar files, because all them are in different groups of devices... At this way all devices of its groups would support the signed jar files, no?

Our doubt is that if it is not possible to send a jar file and be signed for all devices.
Reply With Quote

#4 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-25, 16:55

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
felixksp
Offline
Regular Contributor
Any help please! Anyone who has sent an application to JavaVerified!
Reply With Quote

#5 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-25, 20:44

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,886
Location: Brazil
Send a message via MSN to juarezjunior Send a message via Skype™ to juarezjunior
juarezjunior's Avatar
juarezjunior
Offline
Forum Nokia Champion
Hi felixksp,

I think that the answer provided by Hartti is very informative, just read it once again and make sure you understand it right. Pay attention to what he tells you regarding device groups. You can get more information by checking the links below and also by contacting them directly (check the FAQ for directions).

The Java Verified Program
http://www.javaverified.com/index.jsp
http://www.javaverified.com/faq.jsp

Designing your MIDlet for JavaVerified
http://developer.sonyericsson.com/si...ava_100204.jsp

Common failures during Java Verified testing
http://developer.sonyericsson.com/si...n_failures.jsp

JavaOne presentation
http://developer.sonyericsson.com/ge...do?docId=66584

Hope this helps!


Juarez Alvares Barbosa Junior - Brazil
Reply With Quote

#6 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-25, 21:18

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
felixksp
Offline
Regular Contributor
I understand it.

But I am confused in by that sentence:

"The Java Verified certificate is same on all of the phones though. So once it gets signed with this UTI root, it can be installed on all phones containing the certificate."

What sense has to sign the application once by group, if signing it for one group it can be installed on any device?
Reply With Quote

#7 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-26, 16:10

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,886
Location: Brazil
Send a message via MSN to juarezjunior Send a message via Skype™ to juarezjunior
juarezjunior's Avatar
juarezjunior
Offline
Forum Nokia Champion
Hi felixksp,

Besides availability of UTI certificate, there are other factors you must take into consideration, such as screen sizes, configurations, profiles, optional packages and so on. That is why we have device groups and lead devices afaik. Take a look at the link below:

http://www.javaverified.com/supp_devices.jsp

Hope this helps :)


Juarez Alvares Barbosa Junior - Brazil
Reply With Quote

#8 Old Re: signing - 2007-06-26, 16:46

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
felixksp
Offline
Regular Contributor
Yes I know it. In spite of these limitations, our doubts were that if we sign the application for N91, the same application will work in a N95, being the two in different groups. Doesn't it?

Finally we have decide to sign it first of all for Nokia 95 (3rd edition FP1). After signing the application, I will give some comments on the forum about my experiences in that...

Thank you.
Reply With Quote
Reply « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Display Modes
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Signing with multiple certificates drazvan Mobile Java Networking & Messaging & Security 17 2009-02-10 18:15
Signing: VeriSign vs. Thawte msp Mobile Java General 6 2007-05-29 12:41
Thawte code signing certificates unsupported on Nokia phones? dfun Mobile Java Networking & Messaging & Security 6 2007-01-11 03:42
S60 3rd edition signing types Bill_Murray Installation, Certification and Security 3 2006-12-12 10:27
Signing problem with 6630 and jad file panwoo Mobile Java General 7 2005-11-19 15:57

Rate This

 
Bookmark this page: DeliciousDiggFacebookGoogleYahooStumbleUponRedditDiigoTechnocratiTwitter  Share this page Share this page Print this Page Print this page Invite a friend Invite a friend
京ICP备05048969号    Email Newsletters Press Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Sitemap Contact Us © 2009 Nokia