You Are Here:

Community: Developer Discussion Boards

Reply « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

#1 Old Camera quality low with MMAPI! - 2003-04-09, 23:46

Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26
luemkemann
Offline
Registered User
I'm developing a midlet which uses the MMAPI. The snapshots taken with the camera of the 3650 in my midlet look horrible compared to the pictures taken with the native Camera application.

I've tried using both png and jpeg formats, both are very low quality.

For an example, look here:
http://www.dlcc.de/misc/compare.html
Reply With Quote

#2 Old 2003-04-18, 15:13

Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26
luemkemann
Offline
Registered User
I would really appreciate a feedback on this issue, maybe the Nokia People can comment on this?
Reply With Quote

#3 Old 2003-04-18, 23:49

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1
raphael.ramirez
Offline
Registered User
Hi,

I'm experiencing the same issue with my midlet who takes a snapshot and stores the image (jpg or png) into the RMS.

However, when I try the Camera MIDlet Example from Forum Nokia (http://www.forum.nokia.com/ndsCookie...leParamID=2778), it works fine and the quality is similar to the quality of the native camera application.

What's wrong ?
Reply With Quote

#4 Old 2003-04-22, 19:03

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2
fbosia
Offline
Registered User
Yes I also would be interested in good image quality.
Reply With Quote

#5 Old 2003-05-08, 18:37

Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3
Send a message via ICQ to puffo83 Send a message via AIM to puffo83 Send a message via Yahoo to puffo83
puffo83
Offline
Registered User
Hi i'm italian developer!
You writed in nokia forum:

<----------------------------
Camera quality low with MMAPI!
I'm developing a midlet which uses the MMAPI. The snapshots taken with the camera of the 3650 in my midlet look horrible compared to the pictures taken with the native Camera application.

I've tried using both png and jpeg formats, both are very low quality.

For an example, look here:
<http://www.dlcc.de/misc/compare.html>
-------------------------------->

I used the function getScreenshot of VideoControl class (J2ME)! In this function is possible specified the format and dimension of snapshot! If you insert null the format default is PNG! What is the String parameter for save the image in JPG format and other dimension (ex. 160x120) ??
Thank's in advance!
Reply With Quote

#6 Old 2003-05-23, 18:13

Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26
luemkemann
Offline
Registered User
No solution yet?

Image quality is still poor and no comments from Nokia. Can we expect that this will improve in future phone/firmware releases?
This is very important for future development, as with that poor quality it's not worth developing apps that use the camera.
Reply With Quote

#7 Old taking SnapShot in png format in (Nokia 3650) - 2003-06-12, 14:31

Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
mshelwa
Offline
Registered User
excuse me... well hope you could help me Mr.luemkemann as u dealt with MMAPI..

i tried the example that exists in doc "Camera MIDlet: A Mobile Media API Example" on emulator Nokia 3650 not on real one.

at line: byte[] pngimage =vc.getSnapshot(null);

it throws EOFException and can't read int[] when i'm passing null or "pnp" format.

plus there is folder one of emulator folders is called camera.. i thought when i place my images there it could be viewed with the emulator at run time... but it keeps displaying the default images..

is this example should be tried on real phone!!

any Help,any tips..
Reply With Quote

#8 Old Camera quality low with MMAPI! - 2003-07-10, 16:28

Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2
andreyg
Offline
Registered User
You wrote:
---------------------------
I'm developing a midlet which uses the MMAPI. The snapshots taken with the camera of the 3650 in my midlet look horrible compared to the pictures taken with the native Camera application.

I've tried using both png and jpeg formats, both are very low quality.

For an example, look here:
http://www.dlcc.de/misc/compare.html
---------------------------

Try to use
byte[] pngImage = videoControl.getSnapshot("width=240&height=180")

240*180 is maximum compatible quality with my 3650.
The quality is little bit better than default 160*120 but still is not comparable with photos made by native camera 640*480
Can we expect Nokia will solve this problem?
Reply With Quote

#9 Old 2003-07-16, 12:52

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2
fbosia
Offline
Registered User
Yes Nokia should try to solve this problem, or at least give us some more hints...
Reply With Quote

#10 Old 2003-07-16, 19:36

Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 14
Fencer04
Offline
Registered User
I am experienceing the same problem. My application works fine when I use a picture taken by the General Camera program but when the applicaiton takes its own photo with the MMAPI the image has very poor quality. Where is Nokia's answer on this one?
Reply With Quote

#11 Old 2003-08-05, 11:46

Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 20
avanbrett
Offline
Registered User
I too have tried this on the 3650 and can confirm the image quality is terrible. I tried it in various light conditions and in sunny outdoor conditions you can hardly see the image, its just completly white while indoors its very very dark.

It would be nice of Nokia to at least respond to this post and let us know if this will be fixed for the 6600.

The application I am currently developing for the 3650 is now going to be shelved because we have decided the quality is too poor to use in a commercial app.
Reply With Quote

#12 Old 2003-11-12, 07:52

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5
Location: Switzerland
cfrasci
Offline
Registered User
hi andreyg

did the resolution 240*180 also work on the emulator or have you only tried it on the device?

Greets
cfrasci
Reply With Quote

#13 Old 2003-11-12, 10:22

Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2
andreyg
Offline
Registered User
Hi

It works only on device. Emulator successfully hangs :(
Reply With Quote

#14 Old 2003-11-12, 10:37

Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26
luemkemann
Offline
Registered User
There is supposed to be a list of all known bugs in the 3650 KVM, supposedly on this site. Does anybody know where?
Reply With Quote

#15 Old 2003-11-12, 11:06

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5
Location: Switzerland
cfrasci
Offline
Registered User
hi andreyg

I tested it until resolution of 640*480 with JPEG format on the device. It works, but quality is still very poor.
Reply With Quote
Reply « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Display Modes
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Rate This

 
Bookmark this page: DeliciousDiggFacebookGoogleYahooStumbleUponRedditDiigoTechnocratiTwitter  Share this page Share this page Print this Page Print this page Invite a friend Invite a friend
京ICP备05048969号    Email Newsletters Press Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Sitemap Contact Us © 2009 Nokia 
RDF Facets: qdcZidentifierQSxhttpE3aE2fE2fdiscussionE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2fforumE2fshowthreadE2ephpE3ftE3d134434X qdcZtypeQUqfnZE45E78cludedFromGeneralE4cistingsQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZE44iscussionQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZE44iscussionContentQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qdcZtypeQUqmarsZManagedE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZInformationE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZPageQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQ qfnZtopicQUqfnTopicZentertainmentQ qfnZtopicQUqfnTopicZj2meQ qfnZtopicQUqfnTopicZjavaQ qfnZtopicQUqfnTopicZmediaQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZE44iscussionQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZE44iscussionContentQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qmarsZlanguageQUxhttpE3aE2fE2fswE2enokiaE2ecomE2flanguageE2d1E2fenX qrdfZtypeQUqfnZE45E78cludedFromGeneralE4cistingsQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZE44iscussionQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZE44iscussionContentQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qrdfZtypeQUqmarsZManagedE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZInformationE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZPageQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQ